Vous pouvez trouver l'interview entière accordée au magazine Wired à cette adresse. L'interview est très interessante et on comprend mieux la position des scénaristes par rapport à la série qu'ils ont créée. Il n'y a aucun spoilers, vous pouvez lire sans craintes.
Quelques bons moments :
It has to make some kind of elemental scientific sense to us. It helps us as storytellers to say, OK, a massive amount of electromagnetism could create a wormhole that could allow someone to travel from the island, but that wormhole is unstable and sometimes they might pop up in Tunisia and it’s 10 months earlier than they thought it was. Those kind of things help us.
[...]
But there’s still going to be plenty of room for debate when the show is over. We are going to take a stab at providing a conclusion, and one that we hope will be satisfying on a character level. The bigger questions, we recognize, are not answerable. We feel that demystifying some of the things we do on Lost is like the magician showing you how the trick is done, and we don’t want to do that.
[...]
But when you spend time with a 3-year-old, you quickly find out that one question just begets another—there’s a “why” in the wake of every “why”—and the only way to end the conversation is to say, “Oh look, a Chuck E. Cheese!” The show is doing its best to say, “Oh look, Chuck E. Cheese!”
CAD
